President Donald Trumpâ€™s Wednesday firing of Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not surprising, but it should still be shocking. Sessionsâ€™ sin was not that he was insufficiently wedded to the presidentâ€™s agenda; indeed, the attorney general was perhaps the most effective member of the Cabinet in advancing Trumpist policies. Rather, the president complained that Sessions failed to protect him, as a hired lawyer protects a private client, from legitimate law enforcement inquiries.
Sessionsâ€™ performance as attorney general was far from praiseworthy.
But at some crucial moments, such as when he properly recused himself from the Russia investigation, he showed a fidelity to the independence and integrity of the Justice Department, and it was for that essential loyalty that the president could not tolerate him.
The Justice Department is now in peril. Trump has made clear he wants a lapdog running the nationâ€™s law enforcement apparatus. Some of the people previously mentioned as possible replacements for Sessions - such as former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani or former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt - practically embody craveness. Trumpâ€™s new acting attorney general, Matthew Whitaker, has expressed hostile views about the Russia investigation run by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Trump indicated in a Wednesday news conference that he did not want to end the probe. But, short of stopping it, Sessionsâ€™ successor could drain it of resources or move to cover up its findings.
As the American Civil Liberties Union argued Wednesday, â€śThe Senate must demand that any nominee for attorney general must commit to not interfere in the special counsel investigation, and continue to have Robert Mueller operate under the special counsel regulation.â€ť